Montana-to-Washington Transmission System Upgrade Project (New Substation Site Alternatives)
The following comments were submitted in response to the open comment period described below.
Comments are numbered consecutively as they are received. Breaks in the number sequence result when comments are deleted because they
were submitted in error or have inappropriate content (such as SPAM). If you do not see your comment two business days after
you submit it, please contact (800) 622-4519.
The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is proposing to upgrade parts of its existing high voltage transmission system in Montana, Idaho, and Washington. The proposal is in response to recent customer requests for increased transmission service capacity from BPA’s Garrison Substation in Western Montana to load centers west of the Cascades and to market hubs serving the entire Northwest power market. The proposed upgrades would help BPA accommodate requests for transmission service without having to build any new high voltage transmission lines.
To understand the potential environmental impacts of this proposal, BPA will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. EIS will describe anticipated impacts to natural and human resources and include mitigation measures to avoid or minimize impacts. During this process, BPA will work with federal, state and local agencies, tribes, landowners, and interest groups.
BPA held a series of public meetings to solicit comments on the scope of this proposed project in May through June, 2012. The scoping comment period closed on July 2, 2012 and the comments that were received can be seen in their entirety at www.bpa.gov/goto/M2WScopingComments2012.
In response to the comments received during scoping, BPA is considering new substation site options not previously identified. Because this is a new addition to the original proposal, we would like to hear from you about this project development.
You may submit your comments online at www.bpa.gov/comment; you may fax your comments to (503) 230-4019, or you may call us with your comments toll free at (800) 622-4519. Please submit comments to us by October 31, 2013 and reference the “Montana-to-Washington Transmission System Upgrade Project”. We will post all comments we receive on our website at www.bpa.gov/comment.
To learn more about the project go to: http://www.bpa.gov/go/M2W or contact Andrew Montaño, toll free at 800-622-4519; directly at 503-230-4145; or by e-mail ammontano@bpa.gov.
For More Information: http://www.bpa.gov/go/M2W
Close of comment: 10/31/2013
- MWSUP13 0002 -
DeVosI would like to vote for site options 1,1a,1b,1c,or 5. Thanks
- MWSUP13 0003 -
BrownPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0004 -
CitizenPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0005 -
MarshallPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0006 -
CitizenPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0007 -
AlbrechtPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0008 -
PaynePlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0009 -
CitizenPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0010 -
WilsonPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0011 -
CitizenPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0012 -
Smith/Trout UnlimitedPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0013 -
CrevelingPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0014 -
MuzzanaOptions 2,3,4 are too close to residences. We don't need more power lines, nor do we need our property values to drop because people don't want to live near an ugly substation. These are nice neighborhoods, I'm not sure why this area is even being considered. The most logical place would be option 5, but Option 1, 1b, and 1c look good too.
- MWSUP13 0015 -
Private CitizenThe recent fires in the Lolo drainage and recent flooding in the mountain regions of Colorado highlight the importance of good access to an unrestricted area and a lightly populated working zone. For these reasons alone, options 2, 3 4 and 5 carry too much risk from constrained access issues, potential river and environment impacts or potential complications that result from construction and cleanup issues. Sites listed as 1, 1a, 1b and 1c are better placements for this new facility.
- MWSUP13 0016 -
Chapin/Five Valleys Land TrustPlease see attached document for comment.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0017 -
Lovelace/Montana Dept of Environmental QualityPlease see attached document
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0020 -
Starshine
Surely expanding this transmission line is the best way to expand GREEN electricity.
Thank you for your consideration, Starshine in Great Falls, MT
- MWSUP13 0021 -
Daue/The Wilderness Society and NRDC
- MWSUP13 0022 -
Helding
Good Morniing and Happy Halloween --
Thank you for this comment period. Renewable energy and not just small hydro projects are one of my favorite things. I'm a person who invests in solar energy and watch, with a smile, the building of solar around the globe. Since my utility company does not do tru up I still pay a lost cost for energy and "contribute" for free, energy back to the utility. But, that's okay, as long as it is a beginning of seeing renewable energy online in the Northwest. And, this transmission upgrade can be a part of the growing enthusiasm for renewables.
This transmission upgrade represents the lowest hanging fruit for expanding Montana’s renewable energy. No new transmission lines will be built, no condemnation will be necessary, and no new right of way will be created. Most of the proposed upgrades involve reinforcements to existing infrastructure and the existing 500-kilovolt line. One new substation will be built under existing transmission lines in the existing right of way between Missoula and St. Regis.
Montana has tremendous renewable energy resources. These resources can help the Northwestern United States reduce global warming emissions and meet clean energy goals. Without a way to transport renewable energy, utilities in Washington and Oregon will continue to rely on dirty coal power from Colstrip rather than Montana’s clean solar energy.
- MWSUP13 0023 -
Private Citizen - Multiple Submissions
Dear BPA,
I am contacting you about the proposed Montana to Washington Transmission System Upgrade Project. I believe this project will offer enormous benefits to Montana and the greater Northwest, and offer my support for upgrade.
I believe the Montana-Washington transmission line upgrade should be a priority for BPA because it will:
•Minimize community and environmental impacts •Increase capacity for clean, renewable development to serve Montana and the Northwest •Help meet regional greenhouse gas reduction goals
Importantly, the environmental analysis of the project should have evaluated the reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the renewable energy that has contracted for capacity along the line. Renewable energy offers us a carbon free source and affordable source of energy.
BPA should also include an analysis of the economic benefits of the renewable energy projects from the transmission upgrade. For example, wind projects have already provided over $1.2 billion in capital investment and created over 1,000 construction jobs and over 100 permanent jobs in Montana.
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0024 -
Watson
I am submitting comments on the proposed Montana to Washington Transmission System Upgrade Project. I am convinced that this is a very cost-effective infrastructure investment that will have great benefit to my state (Montana) as well as the rest of the Northwest US.
I urge BPA to make this Montana-Washington transmission line upgrade a priority for BPA for these reasons:
· It will increase capacity for clean, renewable development in the Northwest US.
· This will help us meet regional greenhouse gas reduction goals .
· Because it upgrades existing infrastructure, it minimizes community and environmental impacts.
I urge BPA to analyze economic benefits of the renewable energy projects from the transmission upgrade. For example, wind projects have already provided over $1.2 billion in capital investment and created over 1,000 construction jobs and over 100 permanent jobs in Montana.
I also urge BPA to evaluate the reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the renewable energy that has contracted for capacity along the line. These economic and environmental benefits make this project an important investment in our children’s future.
Thank you for considering these comments.
- MWSUP13 0025 -
McArthur
Dear Folks, it is critical to the future that we provide a pathway to support green energy as quickly as possible . We need to be able to tap the economic growth possible by turning to wind and solar now and we need to be able to transport this clean energy I vastly larger volumes in the future if we are to have the future we all want. Build the infrastructure now!
- MWSUP13 0026 -
Liebert/Citizens for Clean Energy Inc
From: Citizens for Clean Energy, Inc. of Montana, cce-mt.org
On behalf of CCE's membership, we applaud the BPA's commitment to upgrade the Montana-to-Washington transmission system to help EXPORT Montana's abundant clean energy, especially WINDPOWER which will help Montana's economy tremendously, from land lease payments, local taxes and helping to reduce pollution and emissions.
This is a tremendous opportunity and will help our state and Nation move forward as leaders in clean energy.
Sincerely,
Lt. Colonel (Ret, USAR) Richard D. Liebert Chair, Citizens for Clean Energy, Inc.
- MWSUP13 0027 -
Akins
As a resident of Washington I would like you to study the amount of renewable power access we would have using the upgrade to existing lines. If we can use renewable energy for upgrading our capacity then we can rely less on the fossil fuel energies that is also coming from the Colstrip Power Plant in Montana, and used by Puget Sound Energy. This is one of the dirtiest coal plants in the country and poisoning the health of the people in Montana. The reliance on renewable clean energy and using existing lines is a benefit to both states.
Judith Akins
- MWSUP13 0028 -
Waight
Yes! Please do the reinforcements and upgrades necessary to transmit more clean energy and meet clean energy goals. I already do my part with a recent Community Energy Challenge retrofit, and pay for green energy in my PSE bill. Please do your (larger) part.
Thank you.
Jean Waight
- MWSUP13 0029 -
Maki/Montana Environmental Information CenterPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0030 -
Cilimburg/Montana AudubonPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0031 -
Landquist/Missoula County Board of CommissionersPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0032 -
Private CitizenPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
- MWSUP13 0033 -
JohnsonPlease see attached document for comment
View Attachment
|
|
|